← Articles & Updates
Courts & Filings

Federal Sentencing Set for August 7 in Lake Charles in Reardon Courthouse Case

A federal sentencing hearing was set for August 7, 2026 in Lake Charles, closing the trial phase of United States v. Reardon and starting the clock for appellate review.

·Republished from the WordPress editorial library
U.S. Marshals and Department of Justice records associated with the Lafayette federal courthouse case

Originally published by Don Matthews on We The People News on July 30, 2026.

A federal sentencing hearing was scheduled for Friday, August 7, 2026, in the Lake Charles Division of the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Louisiana, marking the end of the trial phase in United States v. Reardon, 6:25-cr-00227.

The case arose from the August 25, 2025 arrest at the John M. Shaw U.S. Courthouse in Lafayette and a conviction under a federal regulation governing conduct on federal property.

Pretrial litigation drew attention to missing courthouse surveillance footage. The government acknowledged that lobby video from the day of the arrest had not been preserved. The defense argued the video could have shown marshals directing Reardon toward the area later characterized as obstructed.

FOIA records also showed that BOLO-style alerts containing Reardon’s identifying information had circulated among marshals and court-security personnel before the arrest. Magistrate Judge Carol B. Whitehurst later recused after ex parte communications came to light, citing an appearance-of-bias concern.

The government recommended unsupervised probation with a restriction on courthouse access. Reardon said he would object, arguing that the condition functioned as a prior restraint on newsgathering, and said he would prefer the full statutory jail term to an indefinite speech-related restriction.

The sentencing hearing also triggered appellate deadlines under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 58(g)(2), with the missing-video and structural due-process issues expected to feature in the appeal.

MORE TO READ

Keep going without the endless scroll.

Browse all articles →
Federal Judge Wrote That Osteen Lied; Fourth Amendment Claim Still Dismissed Under Qualified Immunity
Commentary & AnalysisCourts & Filings

Federal Judge Wrote That Osteen Lied; Fourth Amendment Claim Still Dismissed Under Qualified Immunity

Magistrate Judge Andrew M. Edison wrote that “the record shows that Osteen lied to Judge Tollison” and concluded the complaint stated an unreasonable-seizure claim before recommending qualified immunity. Judge Jeffrey V. Brown later adopted the recommendation and entered judgment against Reardon.

Read More →